So after watching all of the Hobbit Prequel trilogy, I've reached the conclusion that I hate it less than the Star Wars prequel trilogy.
1) The Hobbit movies ruined fewer of my favorite characters. Aragorn
for example, barely name dropped. Sauruman, so confusingly portrayed it
might not have been the same character.
2) Anakin ranting about
sand was a less plausible romance subplot than the dwarf/elf romance,
even though girls never actually pick the shorter guy.
3) Magic, although barely used, is never explained away through pseudoscience.
4) Bunny sled is better than Jar Jar
5) The gratuitous callbacks to the original movies were less offensive
somehow, maybe because Peter Jackson has shown no intention of reediting
the originals with his new bloated vision.
6) Even though the
third movie resolves the unnecessary cliffhanger of the second in the
first few minutes like it's some TV serial and gives us an hour of
Thorin high on dragon gold, it's still more compelling than Anakin's
7) No one ever says "that was so wizard", despite the actual presence of real life wizards doing wizard things.
8) Similarly, Legolas spins on more than one occasion, but has the quiet dignity not to call it out as a good trick.
9) Without the audio, the staggeringly incomprehensible visual
spectacle of the Hobbit wins out chiefly for its artistic value as a
tour through New Zealand
10) If you edit out all the filler and
awfulness, you're left without about a half hour of good movie in the
Hobbit, which might be a worse ratio than the Star Wars prequels, but
still more raw quality